<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Grade Disparities on Acceleration Denied</title><link>https://accelerationdenied.com/tags/grade-disparities/</link><description>Recent content in Grade Disparities on Acceleration Denied</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://accelerationdenied.com/tags/grade-disparities/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The Acceleration Gap: 276 to 26</title><link>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/the-acceleration-gap/</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/the-acceleration-gap/</guid><description>&lt;div class="callout callout-info"&gt;
 &lt;div class="callout-title"&gt;Series Update: December 2025&lt;/div&gt;
 &lt;div class="callout-body"&gt;
 &lt;p&gt;This series has documented a year-long investigation into District 97&amp;rsquo;s acceleration process. The FOIA response arrived December 15, 2025. Key findings: no research supports the rubric thresholds, students at 65% were approved through discretionary review while my daughter at 63% was denied, and the district doesn&amp;rsquo;t track application statistics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Latest:&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href="https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/what-the-foia-revealed/"&gt;What the FOIA Revealed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

 &lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I started looking into why my daughter didn&amp;rsquo;t qualify for math acceleration in first grade, I thought I&amp;rsquo;d find an explanation in her test scores, her classroom work, or maybe some aspect of the district&amp;rsquo;s rubric I didn&amp;rsquo;t understand.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>