<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Superintendent Turnover on Acceleration Denied</title><link>https://accelerationdenied.com/tags/superintendent-turnover/</link><description>Recent content in Superintendent Turnover on Acceleration Denied</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 11:30:00 -0600</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://accelerationdenied.com/tags/superintendent-turnover/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>In Memoriam: District 97's Superintendents (2021-2026)</title><link>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/in-memoriam-superintendent/</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2025 11:30:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/in-memoriam-superintendent/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;This post is a follow-up to &lt;a href="https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/the-authority-vacuum"&gt;The Authority Vacuum&lt;/a&gt;, written just six days before everything changed again.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On November 30, 2025, I wrote about Oak Park District 97&amp;rsquo;s superintendent instability. I documented four leadership structures in four years. I noted that the same interim team from 2021-2022 was back for 2025-2026.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I concluded optimistically: &amp;ldquo;Powell and Wernet will serve through the 2025-2026 school year. That&amp;rsquo;s good—stability matters.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Three days later, Wernet announced she&amp;rsquo;s resigning.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Authority Vacuum: How Superintendent Churn Creates Risk-Averse Principals</title><link>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/the-authority-vacuum/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2025 18:00:00 -0600</pubDate><guid>https://accelerationdenied.com/blog/the-authority-vacuum/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;When I asked Principal Hussain Ali to let my daughter take a math assessment in his building—a routine request that any principal could approve—he escalated it to the district office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I asked him to advocate for my daughter&amp;rsquo;s acceleration, he said he was &amp;ldquo;happy to&amp;rdquo; but only through a formal district appeal process.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I requested a meeting to discuss his role as principal versus district implementer, he offered to meet—but only with a district representative present.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>